December 15, 2009 · · archive: txp/article

Tacoma City Council Meeting - Dec. 15th, 2009

The topic that dominated today’s Committee of the Whole, and that reappeared this evening, is the development agreement between Pacific Plaza LLC and the City of Tacoma. Should the City allow the change in use for the ground floor to allow the Attorney General to move in as we’ve been discussing here?

Dan Putnam from Pacific Plaza outlined a scenario in which they’d be able to attract a grocer to the location should the AG change be approved. He acknowledged that they’ve been working with Supervalu and that they had completed a retail study for the site. That study indicated that downtown could support one grocer. When Councilmember Fey stated that he believes this will be a twenty year decision and that it would be irresponsible for them to pit project versus project. In response, Tom Absher stated that “the Elks isn’t even a project yet” and that that their’s could be in by July.

One contingency for this grocer would be the need for an additional Link stop. Since additional Link stops would need to be funded locally, the developers offered that the City could pay for it using the City’s portion of the income from the AG lease.

It was also stated that the AG will attract approximately 100 people to downtown Tacoma as “feet on the street.”

The response from Council was varied, but skepticism seemed to be growing as the meeting continued and as Councilmember Fey asked for more time.

So, back to our regular meeting … Here are our notes:

R E G U L A R A G E N D A

APPOINTMENTS
Resolution No. 37949 reappointing Barbara Mead and appointing Larry Anderson and Joseph Zawacki to serve on the Foss Waterway Development Authority Board of Directors for terms through September 23, 2012.

Resolution No. 37960 was introduced via suspension of the rules and appoints City Councilmembers to various national, state, regional, and local committees, boards, and commissions for the year 2010.

Resolution No. 37950 approves the Retirement Board’s appointment of Monica Butler to the position of Retirement System Director, beginning January 5, 2010.

RESOLUTIONS
Purchase Resolution No. 37951 awards contracts to:

  1. Milliman, Inc., in the amount of $423,840.00 for actuarial consulting and audit services, for an initial three-year period beginning January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2012, plus the option to extend for two additional one-year periods, for a projected contract total of $691,000.00.; and
  2. Northwest Cascade, Inc., in the amount of $20,000.00 for a cumulative total of $1,264,035.50 to increase the contract for additional work on the extension and/or replacement of existing sanitary sewer and water mains on Adams Street from South 23rd to South 19th Streets; and on North 1st Street between Yakima and Tacoma Avenues.

Resolution No. 37952 authorizes the execution of a three-year lease agreement with Global Locomotive LLC, in the amount of $234,225, with options for three additional one-year extensions, for the existing vacant locomotive and rail car repair facility located on the Western Junction property, at 5915 Waldrick Road Southeast, Tenino, Thurston County.

Resolution No. 37953 authorizes the execution of an agreement with the Tacoma-Pierce County Humane Society, in the amount of $526,000, for animal shelter services for the year 2010.

Resolution No. 37954 authorizes the execution of Special Valuation Tax Agreements for the rehabilitation of the historic properties located at 702 North I Street and 1910-1912 South G Street. This allows the the County Assessor to subtract the renovation costs from their tax assessments for ten years.

Resolution No. 37955 designates the Highlands Golf Course as open space under the City’s and Pierce County’s Open Space Current Use Assessment Program for property tax purposes and recommending that it be granted a 60 percent open space property tax discount as recommended by the Planning Commission; and appointing Council Members Fey, Manthou, and Walker to serve on a Joint Determining Authority with three Pierce County Council Members.

Resolution No. 37956 repeals Resolution No. 32989 and Substitute Resolution No. 35757; and amending the Local Improvement District Policy. The new policy clearly identifies the LID formation policy. Councilmember Lonergan offered an amendment that changed the language to require a majority of owners support the LID process for it to pass.

Resolution No. 37957 authorizes the execution of an interagency agreement with the Washington State Patrol (WSP), in the amount of $150,000, budgeted from the General Fund, to fund the modifications necessary for the City’s use of the WSP communications tower and equipment building, and, in exchange, allowing the WSP to utilize one of the City’s radio sites, including building and tower.

Resolution No. 37958 approves the Administrative Procedures of the Board of Ethics.

Resolution No. 37959 authorizes the execution of the third amendment to the Development, Sale Back, and Lease Agreement for South Park Plaza Public Parking Garage with Pacific Plaza Development, LLC, to provide for the use of approximately 14,000 square feet for non-retail purposes, for a lease with the Washington State Office of the Attorney General. A proposal from Pacific Plaza LLC became the basis for an amendment that changed the calculation of base rent and a few other details. A number of people came forward during public comment to speak for and against the resolution. Everybody on the dais spoke on the issue. In the end, the vote came in as follows – in order of when they spoke:

Talbert: No
Strickland: Yes
Lonergan: Yes
Fey: No
Ladenburg: Yes
Walker: No
Manthou: Yes
Baarsma: Yes

The resolution passed 5 to 3.

FINAL READING OF ORDINANCES
Ordinance No. 27859 extends the final due date for the Limited Tax General Obligation Line of Credit Note, 2005 Pantages Theater, in the principal amount of $2,500,000, from December 26, 2009 to December 26, 2011.

Ordinance No. 27860 authorizes the execution of a Water Wheeling Agreement between Tacoma Water, Rainier View Water Company Inc., and Lakewood Water District, to deliver up to two million gallons of water per day from the Lakewood Water system to the Rainier View system.

Ordinance No. 27862 amends Chapter 6A.30 of the Municipal Code, relating to the business and occupation tax, to change the requirements for paying back the tax credit received for prior periods due to a recognized general recession or a declared natural disaster.

Ordinance No. 27863 amends Chapter 6B.220 of the Municipal Code, relating to taxicab regulations, to require taxicab drivers to submit a medical certification, attend a training program, and pass a written exam prior to license approval; and setting penalties for classes of violations and standards for the denial of taxicab licenses.

Ordinance No. 27864 amends the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and adopting the 2010-2015 Capital Facilities Program.

Ordinance No. 27865 adopts the Six-Year Comprehensive Transportation Program for amended year 2009 and 2010-2015.

Ordinance No. 27866 accepts a federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant, in the amount of $1,947,300; creating a new special fund to be known and designated as the CMO Special Revenue Fund; depositing in and appropriating said sum from the newly created fund to implement the Climate Action Plan.

Ordinance No. 27867 amends Title 10 of the Municipal Code, entitled “Public Works,” by repealing Chapter 10.26 in its entirety, and amending Title 1 of the Municipal Code, entitled “Administration and Personnel,” by creating a new Chapter 1.07 to be known as “Historically Underutilized Businesses.”

Ordinance No. 27868 amends Chapter 10.27 of the Municipal Code, relating to small public works contracts, by repealing and reenacting Sections 10.27.030, 10.27.040, and 10.27.080, and directing the City Manager to review the implementation of said chapter on a continuing basis and to report on the impact of this program on a quarterly basis.

The meeting ended with some reminiscing and humor aimed squarely at the departing City Councilmembers and the Mayor.

That’s the last City Council meeting for the year. Now go have a grand holiday season!

Now about those City Council appointment presentations … ten more to go.

Filed under: City-Council, City-Council

12 comments

  • Jesse December 16, 2009

    “the Elks isn’t even a project yet”

    Oh boy. Isn’t these the same guys behind the Luzon disaster?

    And the AG will put 100 new “feet on the street”? How? By moving across the street from where they are now? Do they mean 100 more feet on the OTHER side of the street? What the hell are these guys selling… and if the city council buys it, I have some property in Kansas right on the ocean for them to consider buying from me… the price: parking lot A and B at the Tacoma Dome.

  • Squid December 16, 2009

    Supervalu!! Excellent, an Albertsons.

  • Becky December 16, 2009

    Jesse got to it before me. AG won’t be adding any more feet; any traffic they attract is already downtown at 11th and Pacific. You know, right across from where Hell’s kitchen is going, right across from the 10th and Commerce transit center, etc.

  • Dan December 16, 2009

    This is unbelievable. So a few days ago, the owners were suggesting that they would share the rent from the lease if the City agreed to the change – and now they are offering the opportunity for the City to use their share of the money to build a new LINK stop at the building. And…IF the city puts in a LINK stop, then MAYBE there will be a grocery store. But hey, this project brings 100 people downtown, and that is a huge improvement because right now those people are a block away, this changes everything!

    So, if I am getting this straight, this owner has gone out and built two floors of office space downtown…and all they have asked for in exchange is City financing for their project, the removal of a neighboring building that blocked the views on the south end of the building, a special exemption from land use codes that apply to every other building owner downtown, and a Light Rail stop. That’s all they need, at least today. If I were Dan Putnam, I would attend every City Council meeting for the next 5-10 years, every time he shows up the City passes a resolution or ordinance to help him get more out of his investment.

  • jamie from thriceallamerican December 16, 2009

    Dan Putnam has the city by the balls. Surprised he didn’t apply for one of the council positions.

  • crenshaw sepulveda December 16, 2009

    Let us just get it over with and move the city council chambers into Pacific Plaza. When the council members need a quick snack they can then just take the link over to the D-Town Market.

  • justanothergeoduck December 16, 2009

    The message our city has now sent is that with enough persistence and threats of embarrassment, any planning documents, sense of vision, or consensus driven purpose can be changed. “We will tell everybody that Tacoma is not open for business” has become the threat that will make anything happen. Long term planning only exists on paper.

  • tom waits December 16, 2009

    i am pretty disappointed with the council’s leadership on this issue.

    and i am not very happy with the apparent lack of intellectual sophistication certain electees betrayed from the dais…similar to the short sighted thought processes that allowed the luzon to go down with nary a whimper from council.

    it should be noted that, while council was thorough in its discussion of the fiscal responsibility it has to the public to protect its investment, very little discussion referred to the responsibility it has to protect the general public interest. the idea of developing retail space was a major component of the justification for public involvement in the project…that was the public benefit, not revenue.

    so when lonergan states that the new offer to share a larger percentage of rent satisfies his requirement for additional public benefit, i think he’s missed the boat entirely.

    i’ll tell you what. i want to propose a project where the city invests heavily as a partner, i and my friends take the contracts for our respective companies, sign our own leases to ourselves, and, if things go sour, have the city amend its agreements and policies to favor our investment.

    what makes business so bad in tacoma is decision making like this. it is very unpredictable, subject to enormous policy shifts, and eats its young.

    boo council.

  • 6ther December 16, 2009

    You’re looking at this the wrong way…

    This Dan Putnam guy is a badass.

    We need to see what else he can get done downtown, since he seems to know how to get city council to grab their ankles!

  • drizell December 19, 2009

    I can’t believe Tacoma would act this desperate. The only message that the City Council is sending is that it can be pushed around by anyone. One minute they’re trying to act tough with the LeMay museum board, the next minute they’re bending over backwards for someone and basically handing the City another big bill in form of another streetcar stop. Am I mistaken, but isn’t there another Link stop just a block away? Are Tacomans too lazy to walk a block?

  • Dan December 19, 2009

    In my opinion, the worst message that this deal sends is that the City is favoring some buildings, projects and businesses over others. The number of favors that have been handed to Putnam and Absher makes it pretty difficult for anyone to compete with them. I can only imagine what some of the other nearby building owners think of the City’s “help”

  • Tacoma1 December 19, 2009

    I totally missed the comments about adding another light rail stop. The only stops that we need to add to T-Link have to be for extending the line, not slowing it down by adding more stops in the middle. Repurposing light rail into the local milk run could easily lower ridership numbers, not increase them.

    The smart thing to do would be to put a grocer in the old Foremost building. It’s huge, for sale, and it’s right across the street from a light rail station already. That is how TOD is supposed to work. You build around the stations. By trying to make light rail stations come to the buildings is wrong headed bassackwards thinking.

    This should be an issue that conservatives, and transit advocates should all be united against. Why spend good money to slow mass transit down. If a person is incapable or unwilling to travel a few blocks without a car, that person won’t be on the light rail system anyway. I encourage everyone to email the council to discourage this idea.